Brade Miller for Michael Redd trade?

only those who know fantasy NBA answer this...





A trade was proposed between Brad Miller for Michael Redd. The trade got veto and the person offering Miller got really upset. He started to curse in our league message board which freaked me out. Who knows what this guy would do next? Will he knock on the doors of those who veto and shoot them in the nuts? who knows...





anyways...would you have veto this trade yourself?





Redd (SG/SF): 23ppg, 44% FG, 86% FT, 1.9 3PT. 4.7 REB, 3.7 AST, 2.6 TO, 1.0 STL, .2 BLK





MIller (C): 14ppg, 44% FG, 86% FT, .4 3PT, 8.9 REB, 3.5 AST, 2.4 TO, .8 STL, 1.1 BLK





If you would have veto, please explain why...





thanks!

Brade Miller for Michael Redd trade?
you fail to mention a key fact. this is a head to head league which has 10 stat categories and daily lineup changes. since when did trading for a position that you desperately need fall out of the formula? what about supply and demand? if i have 3 sg and 1 c i would have to give away a sg to get a c... even if it means downgrading a tad. this isn't about selling out an arena by bringing in big names, fantasy is about pure stats. you do what you need to do to improve your team. and yes i'm the GM that is unloading miller! damn morons... and yes i'm a little sour LOL
Reply:Although I don't think it's an unfair trade, especially considering the play of Miller of late, I'd say Redd is well-too good for a straight-up trade...





The reason vetos are in place are to avoid upsetting the dynamic of the league with "unfair" trades - If your Miller trader wants to argue his point to try %26amp; sway people to alter their vote, I think he should be given the opportunity - but if this is a clear-cut case of a team on the bottom giving up Redd to a team in contention, then you have an issue...
Reply:hell yea i would have vetoed it. the reason why that guy is upset is because the rest of your league arent retards like the guy who accepted the trade. he is mad because he couldnt get away with a steal. look, brad miller sucks, his career is on the downfall, redd can still put up 20 ppg and get you a bunch of 3s shooting a good %. redd is much better than miller.
Reply:I wouldn't have its, semi even, but I would prefer redd.
Reply:Yes.





Just on the names alone I would have vetoed this trade, which I bet most of the people did. Redd is staring to become much more of a household name than Miller is, and that a lot of the time will get people to veto a trade right there.





Next comes the fact that Redd is just better. His PPG, 3's, AST's and steals are better. Also the fact that at anytime Redd can shoot up 50 is always the possibility. Now even though Miller gets RB's and slightly less TO's doesn't even come close to tipping the scale in favor for the guy getting Miller.





Redd is probably one of the 20 best player in this league, and it doesn't hurt that he is the only scorer on his team. Those 23 PPG could easily turn into 30 PPG over a 10 game stretch with a couple of 40 preformances.





The numbers equal it out, but then comes in the player and who they are playing, what they can do, and the team they are on. Miller has never been a 30 point man, but Redd did that on numerous occassions. This trade wasn't fair, even though by the numbers it could have been.





It should have been vetoed.





Good luck!!





Edit: Glad you aren't involved in that trade. I feel sorry for the preson who wanted to trade away Redd. He could have easily gotten a much better center than Miller. The other guy I can understand would be pissed just because he was easily getting the better of this deal.
Reply:i would take miller because hes been really solid this year, but redd has been kinda iffy this year so id say this is fair but the person getting miller gets the better deal
Reply:Are You Trading Redd? Cause Dont.